Gower for the Win

When you make an endorsement, you have to feel completely confident in your choice.
Sure, there’s a fair bit of subjectivity to that. But to say that an incumbent’s time is up, you can’t do that lightly.

In my mind, Stittsville Coun. Shad Qadri is one of the nicest councillors around the council table. He’s always willing to chat, makes times for my questions – and is available most every time I reach out to him.

Sadly for him, Qadri hasn’t been a strong enough voice in his own community and longtime volunteer Glen Gower has launched an incredibly effective campaign to oust him. If you follow Twitter, the response to Gower’s campaign has ben overwhelmingly positive.
Frankly, that’s understandable.

Qadri hasn’t been a leader around council. Never was. Ironically, I found him stronger in the Rogers debate than I’ve witnessed him around the council table in years. But Gower came armed with the facts and a strong presence.

“We need a stronger voice for the residents of Stittsville. People have lost trust in the city and we need to rebuild that,” Gower said in a solid opening statement.

Qadri comes across as too cautious at times. Speaking of changes in policing in Stittsville, which hasn’t made (everyone) happy (what does?). He takes a steady as she goes attitude, instead of Gower’s sense of urgency for change.

“We may be lagging a bit with our new model. Let’s see how it works out, it’s only been six months, maybe a year,” Qadri said.
Just can’t believe this will come close to satisfying his residents who appear to be looking for a more forceful councillor to represent them.

When the public starts looking for someone new, nice won’t cut it.

Gower summed it up pretty well in his closing address, saying the two had known each other for years.

“But I’m still not clear on your vision,” Gower said to his opponent.

He’s not alone.
The nod goes to Gower.

Capital Ward Deserves Better

It’s not easy to simply dismiss a candidate. But in truth, incumbent David Chernushenko has failed to live up to his council responsibilities and Capital ward has paid for that. Last term, he sat on the sidelines criticizing former River Coun. Maria McRae for not doing enough as chair of the city’s environment committee. Sadly, his performance at the helm of the same committee has been abysmal, which is all the more grating given his criticism of a colleague.
Around the council table, it’s often hard to figure out what he stands for.

He’s being challenged by Jide Afolabi, Anthony Carricato, Christine McAllister and Shawn Menard.

And there’s the concern. With so many people running, the vote can be split and Chernushenko – as the incumbent and presumably the one with the best name recognition – can come up the middle. And the candidates challenging him in Capital appear all capable of offering new and fresh ideas in this downtown ward, not a weak one in the bunch.

There’s no doubt Menard is a strong candidate, a great speaker who’s done his homework. But when he started talking about bringing in free transit, he lost me. Where is that money going to come from? Does he know? Does he care?

Carricato was a pleasant surprise, perhaps because he isn’t your typical downtown candidate. (Yes, I know I’m showing my suburban bias. I often find downtown councillors would just like to forget we really are all one big city.) Carricato breaks the usual mold of the downtown councillor, saying there are segments of our society that just can’t afford increased taxes. And while his platform might please me, I’m just not convinced it will win the day in Capital ward.

There’a a certain calmness surrounding McAllister when she speaks. (That being said, I’d just watched the Barrhaven debate for a third time and the contrast was more than notable!) This group as a whole was impressive, they all seemed knowledgeable and were all courteous with each other. That bodes well for all of them in terms of their performance around the council table.

Menard is certainly strong, but I don’t see him accepting his duel role as a representative for both Capital ward and the city as a whole. That’s crucial and too many candidates forget that,

In the final analysis I have to give my nod to McAllister. And I’m not saying that reluctantly.

She came across as a thoughtful and knowlegable candidate who will consider the ideas of her colleagues – while working hard on behalf of both her ward and the city, just as she has as a volunteer. And in presenting herself to the public, she noted issues of concern in both her ward – where she has volunteered for 15 years – and issues like the environment – a city-wide concern.

McAllister would be an amazing addition to the new city council.

Endorsements Not for the Faint of Heart

I take writing endorsements seriously.
I don’t do them lightly and I try to remember that behind every candidate’s name is a person who cares about their community. They wouldn’t have put their name forward otherwise; they wouldn’t be devoting all their time to door-knocking, sacrificing their family time and risking their reputation.
The first time I wrote endorsements was in the early 80s for the Sunday Herald.
In hindsight, I was far too young and far too inexperienced to be writing them.
I remember vividly being at a social gathering after the election I’d made my first endorsement – and a city staffer for an incumbent I hadn’t endorsed – and had lost – said he was out of a job.
“Yeah, I’m out of a job thanks to Sue Sherring,” he said.
I was horrified. I think of that every time I make an endorsement. So I do my research, attempt to be fair and take it all very seriously. For me, endorsements are simply another tool for anyone researching who to vote for.

RogersTV has had all-candidate debates for every ward, the Citizen has asked all candidates to fill out surveys, as has the CBC, And most serious candidates have their own websites. Check it all out. I have.

With all of that being said, there are some races where I simply don’t feel confident enough to make an endorsement; others where I want to throw up my hands in frustration.

In Rideau-Vanier, there are four candidates – incumbent Mathieu Fleury, Thierry Harris, Salar Changiz and Matt Lowe. While all four names are on the ballot, I really see this as a two way race between Fleury and Harris.
Rideau-Vanier is a complicated ward to represent, there’s the Byward Market, Vanier, Sandy Hill and of course a large student population. The Salvation Army relocation debate has dogged this election, and finding the truth behind that is more than difficult.

I’m tempted to throw my endorsement to Fleury, who is clearly dedicated to the community and his residents. And I know he cares. But I realized that would be based solely on knowing Fleury from council. And Harris has proven himself to be a strong contender. This is a tough one. You’re on your own here.

It’s also a real struggle in Barrhaven as well. It’s where I live and where I’ll be voting.
I still don’t know for who.
Incumbent Jan Harder has been a popular councillor in this area for years – with good reason. She works hard, cares about her ward and knows the issues better than anyone.

It’s been years since she’s had a serious challenger. This time around is different, and apparently Harder doesn’t react well to serious competition. Taking Harder on in a televised Rogers debate were candidates
Franklin Epape, Atiq Qureshi and Hadi Wess. There is a fifth candidate registered – Ahmad Malgarai – who didn’t attend the debate and doesn’t have a website.

The debate was an absolute dog’s breakfast, with Harder frequently interrupting the other candidates, calling Wess a liar and dismissing the thoughts of her fellow candidates. There were many times all of the candidates were talking over each other. Pretty difficult to even hear their election promises, as the quartet tried to speak over each other – seemingly oblivious to what viewers were seeing. And they were seeing a real mess for much of the time.

Moderator Mark Sutcliffe had his work cut out for him. He was of course up for the challenge.

Harder was clearly the target of this debate. And being Harder, she didn’t just tell the candidates they were off base, she tried more than once to tell Sutcliffe how to do his job!

One of the key areas of contention is the issue at Stonebridge Golf Course, where Mattamy is talking about increasing the density of that golf course community. Wess seized on the issue during the campaign, knocking on thousands of doors and garnered a lot of interest in his candidacy. Harder appeared slow to take a stand, giving Wess an opening to gain support.

And Harder isn’t taking his success at the doors well – often referencing his recent move into the ward.
Harder herself lives just outside the ward boundaries, something she doesn’t like to share. Asked in a CBC survey if she lived in the ward, Harder wrote that she’d lived in #mybarrhaven for decades.

And she wasn’t about to give an inch to Wess.

“You’re lying again, lying just like you do at the door,” she said.

Epape was an impressive candidate, and was good enough to say some kind words about the incumbent – if ever so briefly.
“I give a lot of credit to Jan Harder,” he said, right before suggesting she hasn’t been responsive enough to her entire community.
“We need someone who will talk to us, and when she doesn’t reply (to the community) that’s a huge problem,” Epape said.

Of the four candidates, Qureshi appeared to have the weakest platform, relying on his financial background to attempt to convince voters he could better get a handle on the city budget.

While the incumbent in any race has a huge advantage, they are also the only ones forced to defend their record.
So Harder was bang on when she suggested during the debate, “I’ve been doing this for more than 20 years in Barrhaven. It’s easy to promise the world when you haven’t got a record to run on.”

If you’re happy with the status quo, Harder is your only choice. If you’re looking for change, consider Wess or Epape.

Oust Brockington

If you’ve been following the shenanigans going in River ward, you must be painfully aware that Riley Brockington doesn’t deserve to be re-elected.
He has proven time and time again he’s more than willing to put himself and his own interests in retaining power ahead of those in his ward. If that means he keeps them in the dark, so be it.
Brockington has shown absolute disregard for public consultation. His lack of consideration for his constituents prompted well-loved Craig Searle to resign as the president of the Riverside Park Community and Recreation Association.

A bit of history.
It’s impossible to understand how or why Brockington thought it was so important to shut out his residents to change the landscape of Mooney’s Bay for a $1 million – funds the city had to match. If you cover city hall, you know that $1 million doesn’t have the clout it used to be. But Brockington sold out Mooney’s Bay, kept the plans from his residents and forced the changes on them without the chance to even have a say about their own community.

Unbelievable. Unbelievable but true.

Then of course there’s Canoe Bay, a neighbourhood-changing development where Brockington didn’t fight for his constituents hard enough. He does listen to Mayor Jim Watson, but as I understand the rules, Watson can’t vote in River ward!

Enter Fabien Kalala Cimankinda, a candidate in River ward who deserves to win the right to represent River ward.
“Kalala’s early years are a familiar story of overcoming hardship as a young immigrant. His family fled war in Congo for a better life in Ottawa. He grew up in the Caldwell projects, where many members of his family still live and where all too many troubled young men and boys succumb to the temptations of crime or become victims of it.
“But it was a shooting, a death and a vow to do something about this kind of senseless violence in the community he grew up in that led to a political awakening and a determination to take his fight to city hall.
“Last year, during a routine visit to Caldwell with his young daughter to visit family, Kalala was thrust into a situation that tested his character and further awakened his passion for community service. It began with gunfire near where his daughter and other children played. Kalala instinctively ran to get the children inside. In the process he saw a man on the ground.
“I still remember to this day my daughter screaming,” Kalala recounted emotionally in an interview with Ottawa Sun columnist Rick Gibbons.
According to Gibbons, Kalala rushed to the young man’s aid and began applying pressure to stop the bleeding in his chest. He started CPR and (assisted by a police officer who had arrived on the scene) did everything he could to keep the shooting victim alive. He recounted how he later drove home, bloodied from the scene, only to hear on radio the young man had died, the story continues.

His political activism stepped up, and he became even more involved in his community.

A motion was moved at the Community and Protective Services Committee to recognize Kalala for his bravery. A ceremony was arranged for February.
But days before the event, Kalala was notified it was cancelled due to a heavy committee agenda. It never happened.

It wasn’t until June that Kalala was finally notified the event would be postponed on the recommendation of the city solicitor since, by then, Kalala had officially registered as a candidate for River Ward and the city had all sorts of reasons why it couldn’t go ahead.

This is one of the ugliest stories to find its way into city hall. Kalala is a hero and whoever is to blame, he wasn’t honoured for what he did for this city.
Everyone knows someone isn’t being honest about the delay, but regardless, if Brockington were any kind of a real leader – he would have insisted the honour go ahead.

Not likely.

So oust Brockington, elect Kalala and know your ward will be the better for it.

Also running are Kerri Keith, who appears to be a thoughtful and sincere candidate and Hassib Reda.
I don’t mean to dismiss their candidacy, but Kalala is the right man at the right time. And River ward would be the richer for his presence at city hall.

Dirty Politics in Osgoode

Having served one term as the councillor for Osgoode, incumbent George Darouze is facing four incumbents, two of them strong
contenders standing in the way of him securing a second term.

There’s Jay Tysick, who most recently ran in the rural area provincially and Kim Sheldrick, a thoughtful candidate, who ran last time against Darouze and knows what she’s talking about it. Both are quality candidates worthy of your consideration.

Also running is Mark Scharfe, who wants to cancel the green bin program. That’s enough for me to dismiss him as a viable candidate. In addition, he doesn’t want senior staff to make more money than Mayor Jim Watson. That’s pie in the sky, won’t happen and you’d never attract quality senior level candidates. Enough said.

Here’s the thing you need to know. Tysick is a good friend of mine. He campaigned for me in 2014 when I barely knew him. Since then, I’ve come to know him as a a solid, loyal friend – who cares deeply about just about everything! He’s a strong family man who wants to make a difference in his community. Our politics differ greatly. But on the municipal level, what matters is a strength of your convictions and the understanding of how the process at city hall works and how to get things done. That description is Tysick to a T.

Darouze was supported last time around by outgoing councillor Doug Thompson, who has since soured on Darouze – and threw his support to Tysick. There were fireworks between Darouze and Tysick during much of a Rogers debate. Seems Darouze is running scared if the Rogers debate is any indication.

There’s a dirty little smear campaign going on directed at Tysick. Seriously kids, is this what you do when confronted with solid competition? Shame. This isn’t meant to implicate Darouze. I have no proof of that. There’s no doubt that the website WhoIsJay.ca appears to have been created to discourage voters from marking their ballot for Tysick. The website has since been taken down, but it was calling for voters to reject Tysick. Joël Charbonneau, a Tysick supporter, filed a complaint about the site on Friday, arguing that the site violated election rules.

According to the complaint filed with the city clerk, the website calling for voters to mark their ballots against Tysick violates the rules for third-party advertisers. Third-party advertisers are not supposed to be in any contact with a candidate in the election. This sort of advertisement — whether it’s an expression of support or opposition- has to be separate from the candidate’s campaign. Charbonneau’s complaint stated the website is hosted by Adam Sooley, who is also the president of the Greely Community Association.

Sooley has confirmed his company was hosting the site but said he was not involved with it and would not say who his clients are. He also confirmed that he was hosting the re-election website for Darouze, the incumbent councillor. That’s cozy.

According to a post on WhoIsJay.ca, seven individuals (not named) are responsible for the site, which makes a number of statements about Tysick. The website could be considered third-party advertising. Third-party advertisers are required to register with Elections Ottawa before any activity, and that wasn’t done in this case.

City solicitor/clerk Rick O’Connor responded to Charbonneau in an email.

“In light of your complaint, I will review this further to assess whether there is a contravention of the MEA (Municipal Elections Act). This review will also further inform me whether or not I will excercise my statutory discretion under the MEA to pursue this issue further,” O’Connor wrote.

There’s a fifth candidate in the race who didn’t appear at the Rogers debate. Auguste Banfalvi, asked by a Citizen survey who he would vote for mayor responded, “None of your business.”

But Darouze didn’t even bother to respond to the Citizen survey. That’s disconcerting. Maybe he doesn’t realize the need to inform or the time restraints most of us have. Of course, in a discussion of city hall meeting locations, Darouze said it was no big deal for residents to take part of their day to attend a meeting at Ben Franklin Place. Clearly, Darouze has forgotten what it’s like to have a 9 to 5 job where you’re expected to be there from 9 to 5, juggle kids and get supper. Sheldrick set him straight.

Ousting an incumbent isn’t easy. But Darouze hasn’t proven himself to be a strong proponent for the rurals.
And while I think highly of Sheldrick, with Mayor Jim Watson at the helm, the rurals need a strong voice.
Tysick is the candidate for the job.

Another Term for Egli

Let’s face it. There appears to be little chance Knoxdale-Merivale Coun. Keith Egli is going to be ousted tomorrow,
There are four other white men trying to take his job: Warren Arshinoff, James Dean, Luigi Mangone and Peter Anthony Weber.
Just can’t see it happening.
Aside from Weber, who seemed only intent on rudely interrupting and constantly speaking over Egli – the other three have something solid to offer. But this isn’t their time. At one point, Weber interrupted Egli asking, “Are you nuts?” How eloquent.
At another point, when Weber interrupted Egli, the incumbent asked if he could continue. Weber said no. Not classy, not vote-worthy.

Of the challengers, Arshinoff was the strongest. Loved his homage to Nepean, a green t-shirt with the Nepean bell, but if this was his job interview, he might not have made it through the front door. He has some solid ideas which deserve consideration.

I’ve admired Dean for some time. He’s committed to serving his community, but yet – he still does’t come across as a solid challenger. But who knew our Nepean schooling history was exactly the same, St. Gregory’s, Frank Ryan, then Merivale High School!

Mangone showed some promise, but he will have to stay involved in the community if he wants to represent the ward one day.

I was surprised to hear Egli boast about moving a motion to lower the amount of snowfall needed for when city snow plows go out.
That’s smoke and mirrors. It was his report which initially proposed lowering the standards. There was a loud hue and cry when the report was released – and Egli had to backtrack.

A bit shocked Elgi is getting heat for not spending all of his office budget. All taxpayers across the city should be thanking him for respecting our money. And he has a right to be proud of his efforts.

Still, Egli has been a solid player on council this term and deserves to be re-elected.

Can Qaqish, City Hall’s Selfie King, Keep his Seat?

There’s a fascinating race going on in Gloucester-South Nepean, where the poor performance of incumbent Michael Qaqish has brought out several strong candidates who’d like to oust him after his disappointing first term.

For the record, I ran against Qaqish in the 2014 election. He won, I lost. So I wouldn’t be surprised if one sees this just as a case of sour grapes. That’s your right of course. We’re all entitled to our opinions. This blog is my opinion.

Qaqish is one of several yes-men for Mayor Jim Watson.
But that’s not the most egregious thing about him.

He’s treated our money as if it’s his own, instead of treating our tax dollars with respect. Much has been said about him spending more than $90,000 on vanity ads, including his humungous photo posted on bus shelters. His explanation? He’s new to the ward and needed people to know who he was.

Give your head a shake. It’s not our job to help him become better-known.
Called out on the outrageous spending during a Rogers all-candidate debate, Qaqish had the gall to again defend the expenditure.
Described by many tweeters as the selfie king of city hall, his campaign was given a real shake-up with the entry of former CTV anchor Carol Anne Meehan.

Meehan is living the life many of us are out in the ‘burbs, raising a family, traveling our increasingly clogged local roads where transit isn’t great and bike lanes don’t meet up.
She worries about her taxes, and more importantly, she’ll worry about yours.

Aside from Qaqish and Meehan there are three other candidates in the race. Irene Mei appears to be a thoughtful and sincere candidate, but don’t think this is her time. Zaff Ansari was solid in the debate, but like so many other newbies, speaks out of both sides of his mouth in terms of worrying abut high taxes and adding services. Harpreet Singh was impressive in the debates as well.
With five candidates running, there’s a real concern the incumbent comes up the middle to win in a vote split.
For my money, Meehan is not just the best situated to beat Qaqish, she’s also the best candidate

Take Tierney for the Win

It’s a two-way race in Beacon Hill-Cyrville ward where real estate agent Michael Schurter was a surprise last-minute candidate.

Incumbent councillor Tim Tierney was just getting ready to pop the champagne in celebration of being uncontested when On the City, From the Burbs phoned him to break the news of an unexpected candidate. What actually followed after that conversation between Tierney and I is now under an OPP investigation. There are unproven allegations that Tierney reached out to Schurter and offered to make a donation to the Ottawa Food Bank if Schurter didn’t go ahead with his registration. Tierney has said he did nothing wrong. Unfortunately for voters, the OPP investigation has cast a huge shadow over this particular raced.

During a media scrum following his registration as a candidate, Schurter said he was running because no one should be acclaimed, saying that’s not democratic. Well, I admire anyone who puts themselves forward, but as I pointed out to Schurter – if that was his sole reason – that’s really not providing an alternative.

“At the end of the day, I think he’s a good councillor,” Schurter said during the scrum. Well, if Schurter is happy with Tierney’s representation, pretty hard to buy into some of the allegations he’s making now about Tierney’s leadership.

Another concern? Schurter replied to a CBC survey calling for a “negative percentage” tax increase, but wants to see the Ottawa Police Board budget increase more than 2%. Apparently that’s the new math. As an aside, this sort of budget talk is pretty common from new candidates, vowing to reduce taxes but do more for city residents at the same time.

It’s certainly not clear how well Schurter knows this ward, one he doesn’t live in. I don’t believe you neccessarily have to live in the ward you run in. Neither Barrhaven Coun. Jan Harder or Gloucester-Southgate Coun. Diane Deans live in their wards, but I’ll bet no one knows their wards better.

But there’s just something out of sorts with Schurter saying he plans to move into the ward. Just a little too convenient.

It’s hard to understand why Tierney was so intent on being acclaimed. And depending on the outcome of the OPP investigation, it could be his downfall. But innocent until proven guilty.

Tierney has made some unfortunate office purchases on the public’s dime. Let’s hope he’s learned from those mistakes. He’s worked hard on the Ottawa Library file, seems to keep his residents happy and works hard on their behalf.

There really only is one choice in Beacon Hill-Cyrbville and that’s Tierney.


In Rideau-Rockcliffe, incumbent Tobi Nussbaum is being challenged by candidate Peter Heyck. Heyck seems like a nice, sincere man who cares about his community. But even he doesn’t seem to believe he has a chance of winning.

Heyck didn’t seem to have any issues with Nussbaum, and didn’t have a strong developed platform. At a Rogers debate, Heyck urged people to vote – then – as if an afterthought, remembered to say he’d like their vote. It certainly was one of the most cordial of debates. While clearly new, wouldn’t be a bad thing at all if Heyck makes a return run.


Moffatt for the Win

The first time I interviewed Scott Moffatt was more than 12 years ago when he had decided to take on incumbent Coun. Glenn Brooks. Sure, he was new and he didn’t have all of his facts at hand. At that point, I’d been covering city hall off and on for more than 20 years. And though he was new, he still stands out in my memory as the strongest and most impressive newcomer I’ve interviewed.
He didn’t win, but came back four years later and earned the job of Rideau-Goulbourn councillor.

What’s to like about Moffatt? He doesn’t pander to nonsense – and he won’t tell his residents something that isn’t true just to make them happy or get elected. That on its own is pretty remarkable. I’ve seen him in action, at committee and city council meetings – and speaking at public meetings in his own ward. He’s a straight-shooter, even when his residents resisted the message. But he’s always there getting the best deal for the community he lives in.

Our politics are different, of course, he’s very much on the right. I’m there on occasion, depending on the issue!

And I’ve only seen him nervous once around the media – me specifically. It was at his first inaugural city council meeting – and Mayor Jim Watson’s first Tim Horton’s cookie and coffee celebration. Moffatt introduced me to his proud mother – who couldn’t help but confide in me the cookies were stale!

It’s a rarity to see Moffatt’s mug turn up on social media from being at any of the many social gatherings you’ll see other councillors at – his interests are in the ward.

His only challenger is Dave Brown, who used to work for Moffatt until he decided he’d try to take his boss’s job. That doesn’t sit quite right with me.

But the truth is, while Brown worked with Moffatt, he seems to have written his own playbook to woo the voters of Rideau-Goulbourn. And as is often the case with newcomers, he’s more than happy to promise to do with less. And he acted like he’d been the first to discover that a 2% tax increase every years adds up to more than 2% over four years.

“Where’s all that money going?” Brown demanded to know.

And he also demanded staff cuts continue so the city could provide more services. Just who is going to provide those services if said cuts continue? You want an ice rink without a zamboni driver?
Brown also went on a bit of a rant about the growing pile of garbage at Trail Rd., but didn’t seem to mention the rurals who receive the green bin program but have been resistant to it. To his credit, Brown did rightly point out this council has moved at a snail’s pace in dealing with its garbage crisis. He was bang on with that one. But it was just one.

If you live in Rideau-Goulbourn, Scott Moffatt has earned your vote.

Don’t Agree With Mayor Watson, You’re Blocked!

Should Mayor Jim Watson be able to block Ottawa residents on Twitter – given that his own taxpayer-paid staff sometime operate the account?
It’s an interesting question. And it’s the same one I asked on this blog back in August. And until I started asking questions this summer, the mayor’s Twitter icon was on his city of Ottawa website. How much more proof do you need? Wonder if I can get my personal Twitter handle on that website?

This week, Watson was served with a lawsuit by three local citizens who’ve all been blocked by Watson. They’re suing him, arguing he’s violating their charter rights. And while there are just three names on the suit, the trio is part of what seems to be pretty big group, judging by the number of people complaining about it on Twitter.

Having covered Watson since our days at Carleton University in the early 80s, this just never used to be his style. But sadly, it seems Watson is increasingly digging in his heels on many issues for no good reason, refusing to consider anything other than the line he’s decided to stand on. And this stance is clearly just ridiculous, even for a mayor who now seems to care more about being perceived as being right, rather than actually doing the right thing.

Back in the summer, city clerk Rick O’Connor told On the City, From the Burbs that city staff were reviewing the city’s standards around politicians and their Twitter accounts. And he says they’ll be coming up with a policy guiding municipal politicians’ activity on Twitter. The last time I checked in with him, there was no new update. At the time, he said he didn’t know Watson sometimes used city staff to update his Twitter account.

Given a recent ruling from the United States that American President Donald Trump shouldn’t be blocking people, the issue has got a little bit more attention.
Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, a federal judge in New York City, said in her ruling that Trump is violating the U.S. Constitution by preventing certain Americans from viewing his tweets on @realDonaldTrump.
The social media platform, Buchwald said, is a “designated public forum” from which Trump cannot exclude individual plaintiffs. She rejected an argument by the Justice Department that the president had a right to block Twitter followers because of his “associational freedoms.”
And the mayor’s penchant for blocking people who tweet him too frequently or simply oppose his positions – has some Ottawa residents crying foul. He uses the site to update the public on council proceedings, on his whereabouts – and views of interest to the citizens of Ottawa.

It was Ottawa resident Philippe Denault,just one of those who was blocked by Watson, who prompted me to write the blog.
Denault is part of SOS Vanier, which fought the move by the Salvation Army to set up a new shop.
He said he was never nasty with his tweets, just part of a movement concerned about what some say is a mega-shelter headed to Vanier.
And he doesn’t believe that Watson – who is supposed to be representing the entire city – should block any of the residents who pay his salary.
“On top of that, the mayor uses his account for official purposes and, without any other reason than being criticized by people (who sometimes only retweeted or used his twitter handle), he blocks citizens from reading his statements.
“I feel that, in city politics, there is too much personal stuff going on that is mixed up with official duties,” he wrote to On the City, From the Burbs.

Watson has also blocked Matt Muirhead. Muirhead is now running for councillor in Kanata against Watson buddy David Gourlay.
“As a longstanding advocate for my community, it concerns me when a powerful politician, (as with Mr. Watson), cannot accept challenging criticism, nor debate, in a public forum like Twitter. Blocking me is also equivalent to blocking the community of Kanata North, where I have been president of two community associations, representing the voice of the community, and having spoken truth to power for many years.
“If the mayor chooses to speak on Twitter, or anywhere else, people should be allowed access to speak up on legitimate issues of concern. Canada is a society that prides itself on free speech, and government leaders should remain accountable and accessible. Cherry-picking support for council candidates on Twitter, or re-tweeting only words of effusive support, are not the ideal of a democratically elected official. Mr. Watson blocking me (or anyone), from communication, who air thoughtful concerns about the mayor’s decision-making, or other concerns, is troubling.
A government leader stifling debate and criticism (including me, as a candidate for city council) befit an entirely different society altogether—not ours,” Muirhead said.

Look, I don’t think Watson or anyone else should put up with abusive language.
But a difference of opinion, why is Watson now so thin-skinned?

I blocked someone today, an annoying guy who appears to just want to tell me what a bad person I am. But I don’t represent him – and he doesn’t help pay for my salary.

It’s only fair to allow someone, even a politician, to block whomever they wish on Twitter if they feel that they’re being threatened or harrased. But elected politicians represent all of their constituents, not only those who voted for them, and it’s just wrong for a politician to prevent their detractors from speaking out. And even worse, to silence the very people you represent and pay for your right to be there.